cdparanoia/patches/cdparanoia-3.9.8-sgio-smalldma.patch

--- cdparanoia-III-alpha9.8/interface/scsi_interface.c.smalldma	2004-10-06 16:15:50.778406009 -0400
+++ cdparanoia-III-alpha9.8/interface/scsi_interface.c	2004-10-06 16:17:51.438686857 -0400
@@ -169,8 +169,6 @@
 
   cur=table*reserved;
 
-  ((struct sg_info *)d->sg)->dxferp_max_buffer_len = cur;
-
   /* so since we never go above q->max_sectors, we should never get -EIO.
    * we might still get -ENOMEM, but we back off for that later.  Monty
    * had an old comment: "not too much; new kernels have trouble with DMA
@@ -182,8 +180,12 @@
    * still fail the wrong way.  This needs some kernel-land investigation.
    */
 #if 1
-  cur=(cur>1024*32?1024*32:cur);
+  if (!getenv("CDDA_IGNORE_BUFSIZE_LIMIT")) {
+    cur=(cur>2352*24?2352*24:cur);
+  }
 #endif
+  ((struct sg_info *)d->sg)->dxferp_max_buffer_len = cur;
+
   d->nsectors=cur/CD_FRAMESIZE_RAW;
   d->bigbuff=cur;
 
1	--- cdparanoia-III-alpha9.8/interface/scsi_interface.c.smalldma 2004-10-06 16:15:50.778406009 -0400
2	+++ cdparanoia-III-alpha9.8/interface/scsi_interface.c 2004-10-06 16:17:51.438686857 -0400
3	@@ -169,8 +169,6 @@
4
5	cur=table*reserved;
6
7	- ((struct sg_info *)d->sg)->dxferp_max_buffer_len = cur;
8	-
9	/* so since we never go above q->max_sectors, we should never get -EIO.
10	* we might still get -ENOMEM, but we back off for that later. Monty
11	* had an old comment: "not too much; new kernels have trouble with DMA
12	@@ -182,8 +180,12 @@
13	* still fail the wrong way. This needs some kernel-land investigation.
14	*/
15	#if 1
16	- cur=(cur>102432?102432:cur);
17	+ if (!getenv("CDDA_IGNORE_BUFSIZE_LIMIT")) {
18	+ cur=(cur>235224?235224:cur);
19	+ }
20	#endif
21	+ ((struct sg_info *)d->sg)->dxferp_max_buffer_len = cur;
22	+
23	d->nsectors=cur/CD_FRAMESIZE_RAW;
24	d->bigbuff=cur;
25